Categories Courts

AJK High Court Suspends USC Order for Employee Service Removal

Accepting the plea of a large number of aggrieved employees of the Utility Stores Corporation (USC) in Muzaffarabad Region, the Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court has sought a comprehensive response from people at the helm of affairs, who have been blamed for removal of petitioner from service and shutting down store operations in the region.

Advocate High Court Syed Abdul Basit Gillani filed the petition, making the USC Chairman Board of Directors and others as respondents saying the USC decision to merge stores and closure of operation will curtail fundamental rights of aggrieved employees.

Advocate Gillani apprised the court that the USC failed to issue service regularization formal orders petitioner. He also informed the court that respondents were delaying regularization without any justification and ultimately relieved the petitioner from the service on the garb of rightsizing.

Syed Abdul Basit Gillani requested the court to issue stay order to the extend to adopt any policy of closure or merger of stores in Muzaffarabad region which may deprive the petitioners from their accrued rights and benefits of service including pension, gratuity and other pension benefits as admissible for regular employees of the USC.

After a brief hearing of the matter, the court issued stay order against impugned notices of the USC issued in April 8, 2025. The court directed respondents of the matter to submit response in the matter for further proceedings on May 6,2025.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Judicial Commission of Pakistan, JCP meeting 2026, Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, Islamabad High Court judges, Balochistan High Court judges, ad-hoc judges Pakistan, Justice Ayub Khan, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, IHC judge appointments, BHC judge appointments, JCP confirmation, Pakistani judiciary news, judge competency controversy, Supreme Court Pakistan, judicial appointments Pakistan, SHC judge appointments, judicial policy Pakistan, Judicial Commission rules 2024

JCP Approves 4 Ad-Hoc Judges for IHC and BHC; One Appointment Declined

ISLAMABAD: The Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), led by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, approved four…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court of Pakistan, SCBA Pakistan, Advocates-on-Record, AOR facilitation center, litigant facilitation Pakistan, access to justice Pakistan, court service delivery, legal aid Pakistan, efficient justice system, transparency in courts

SCBA Inaugurates AOR & Litigant Facilitation Center at SC – AORs Urge Leadership to Review Facility Standards for Smooth Operations

ISLAMABAD: As part of on-going reforms aimed at strengthening service delivery and enhancing access to…

Khudayar Mohla, FCC pension ruling, EOBI pension Pakistan, 14.5 years service pension, workers’ rights Pakistan, pension eligibility Pakistan, retirement benefits Pakistan, Employees’ Old-Age Benefits Act, vested rights Pakistan, social welfare benefits, pension legislation Pakistan

FCC Upholds Workers’ Pension Rights: 14.5 Years of Service Qualify for Monthly Benefits

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) affirms workers’ fundamental right to a pension, holding that…