Categories Courts

SC’ Justice Mansoor Ali Shah Raises Objections on ICA Bench

Although it is prerogative of the Parliament to make or amend a law to regulate activities of every organ of the State within framework of rules and regulations but recently promulgated 26th Amendment in the Constitution of Pakistan still in question to the extent of judiciary.

A private television reveals that according to sources Justice Mansoor Ali Shah has raised objections to the composition of the intra-court appeal bench. The objection were raised specifically with the inclusion of Justice Jamal Mandokhail and Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar in the bench.

Justice Shah expressed concerns in a letter to the judges’ committee, citing that both justices are part of the Constitutional Committee, which had previously transferred the case to itself that was initially being heard by Justice Shah.

Justice Shah had initially proposed a five-member bench for the Intra  Court Appeal  (ICA) , but the Chief Justice suggested that a four-member bench would suffice. However, when the bench was formed, it included six judges, prompting Justice Shah’s objection.

Earlier, Additional Registrar Judicial, Nazar Abbas challenged the contempt notice issued by Supreme Court (SC) against him. As per details, Nazar Abbas has also filed an application seeking a stay order on the contempt proceedings initiated against him. The Supreme Court (SC), acknowledging Nazar Abbas’s intra-court appeal, has constituted a six-member larger bench to hear the case.

A six-member bench formed, led by Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail will take up the plea on January 27.According to the court’s official notification, the bench comprises Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Justice Athar Minallah, both of whom bring extensive judicial expertise to the proceedings; additionally, Justice Hassan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Shahid Waheed, and Justice Musarrat Hilali have also been included in the larger bench, ensuring a robust and comprehensive adjudication of the appeal.

On January 20, the Supreme Court (SC) issued show-cause notice of contempt of the court to its Additional Registrar Nazar Abbas, ordering him to appear in person. Barrister Salahuddin during the hearing of a case informed the bench headed by Justice Mansoor Ali Shah that the court had ordered to fix the case today, but the cause list was not issued. “Why the case with regard to the Supreme Court benches powers, was not fixed before the court,” Justice Shah asked as he summoned the court official. Deputy Registrar Zulfiqar Ahmed appeared before the court and informed about the leave of the additional registrar.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…

Khudayar Mohla, FAO, First Appeal, Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, LHC Bahawalpur, Ad Interim Injunction, Temporary Injunction, Stay Application, Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC, Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, Maintainability, Specific Performance, Balance of Convenience, Balance of Inconvenience, Interlocutory Order, Solar Energy Dispute, On-Grid Solar System, Solar Installation Agreement, Commercial Litigation, Energy Contract Dispute, SS Paper Board Mills, Swift Solar Energy, Civil Judge Rahim Yar Khan, Justice Malik Waqar Haider Awan, Sardar Abdul Basit Khan Advocate, Rs 87868000, Daily Loss Rs 250000, Installment Default, Security Cheques, Payment Dispute, Commercial Loss, Shariq Builders 2024 MLD 32, Muhammad Rasab 1998 MLD 2045, Abdullah Sugar Mills 2003 SCMR 1026, Indus Motor Company 2025 CLC 1951, Mst Shazia Mehmood 2025 MLD 1976, Approved for Reporting, FAO No 09 2026 BWP, March 12 2026, Snake Bitten Antidote, Judicial Empathy, 15 Days Directive, Pakistan Court News, Lahore High Court Order 2026, Solar Energy Pakistan, Civil Court Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan Solar Dispute, LHC Order 2026, Pakistan Judiciary News, Court Reporting Pakistan, Legal News Pakistan, High Court Pakistan 2026

“Snake-Bitten May Die Waiting for Antidote” – LHC Disposes Solar Appeal, Orders Trial Court to Decide Stay Application in 15 Days

BAHAWALPUR : A Rahim Yar Khan-based paper and board mill, bleeding Rs. 250,000 daily, invoked…

Khudayar Mohla,Peshawar High Court, PHC ruling, civil courts jurisdiction, load shedding disputes, PESCO load shedding, Kohat load shedding, NEPRA jurisdiction, electricity load shedding Pakistan, PHC verdict, Justice Waqar Ahmad, NEPRA Act 1997, Section 45 NEPRA Act, civil revision petition, Jangal Khel Kohat, prolonged load shedding, 18 hour load shedding, discriminatory load shedding, fundamental rights violation, electricity consumers Pakistan, PESCO administrative policies, Barrister Asadul Mulk, power outages Pakistan, electricity distribution Pakistan, NEPRA regulatory body, special jurisdiction principle, Section 9 CPC, Code of Civil Procedure, Supreme Court precedents Pakistan, electricity complaints Pakistan, power sector regulation, load shedding KPK, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa electricity, consumer rights Pakistan, electricity grievances, NEPRA complaint forum, civil court dismissed, district court Kohat, electricity generation transmission, power distribution policy, judicial intervention electricity, legal jurisdiction electricity, Pakistan power sector, electricity law Pakistan, regulatory authority Pakistan, load shedding schedule, electricity supply company, high court KPK, Pakistan judiciary, electricity policy Pakistan, power outages fundamental rights

PHC Rules Civil Courts Lack Jurisdiction Over Load Shedding Disputes

PESHAWAR: While hearing a civil revision petition in a matter relating to prolonged daily load…